Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Mr Paul Stafford search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Changes to Green Belt policy

Representation ID: 3112

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Mr Paul Stafford

Representation Summary:

Green belt is green belt used for agriculture and woodland etc .
There is no justification for using green belt.
Developers obviously prefer to use green belt, to increase profits, without providing and additional local services.

There is no shortage of housing or land with planning in most of Cheshire.
Merging of areas is taking place there are now very little gaps in many places between Cheshire and Greater Manchester any further Development in the areas bordering Greater Manchester should be resisted

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Spatial development strategy

Representation ID: 3113

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Mr Paul Stafford

Representation Summary:

This was not wanted and not supported by the residents.

Again ignored consultations.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Supplementary planning documents

Representation ID: 3114

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Mr Paul Stafford

Representation Summary:

Then why do you accept poor quality building on poorly designed estates.

For example no kerbs, no footpaths

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Strategic environmental assessment

Representation ID: 3115

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Mr Paul Stafford

Representation Summary:

But will you take any notice?

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

4 Baseline information and spatial portrait

Representation ID: 3116

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Mr Paul Stafford

Representation Summary:

Any development in the north is just to serve Manchester overspill and should be stopped

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Size, geographical location and population distribution

Representation ID: 3117

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Mr Paul Stafford

Representation Summary:

You are just allowing and becoming a suburb of surrounding urban areas.
Should be aiming to maintain the rural nature.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Connectivity

Representation ID: 3118

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Mr Paul Stafford

Representation Summary:

The Roads are often gridlocked and unusable. They are incapable of serving existing traffic.
Therefore this is not in any way of benefit. Therefore there should be no further development that relies on the inadequate Motorway network.
This needs to made clear to the Government.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Connectivity

Representation ID: 3119

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Mr Paul Stafford

Representation Summary:

You are incorrect the transport links are completely inadequate.
Please correct this incorrect assumption it is not easy to visit other parts of the country with gridlocked roads.
Have you not noticed the number of times the M6 is closed ?

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Heritage, culture and natural environment

Representation ID: 3120

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Mr Paul Stafford

Representation Summary:

Have you not heard, Jodrell Bank is being unfunded.

You are correct the Green belt needs to be protected.And agricultural uses maintained and encouraged.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Settlements and rural-urban composition

Representation ID: 3121

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Mr Paul Stafford

Representation Summary:

So maintain this , perhaps limiting development to Crewe, however infrastructure would have to be improved first.
The planned new Leighton Hospital will be inadequate for a growing population as it only provides the same number of beds existing and presently inadequate.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.