Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Alison Small search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

How to respond

Representation ID: 5815

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Alison Small

Representation Summary:

We have concerns as to the timescale allowed for initial input given the Parish Councils often
do not meet over the summer period. and many residents being on holiday during the summer
school holiday. We ask the Council to reach out to all Town and Parish Councils to ensure
they have had chance to review and input given the importance of this process. We would ask
that the next programmed consultation period take into account school holiday periods.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

2 New local plan

Representation ID: 5818

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Alison Small

Representation Summary:

Planned Development should be through the Local Plan Process.
Any large strategic housing and commercial developments should only be brought forward
through the Local Plan process following meaningful engagement with local communities,
elected members, town and parish councils and key stakeholders. Communities should have
confidence that strategic growth has been assessed transparently against reasonable
alternatives and that local knowledge has informed decision-making from the outset.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

3 Context for the new local plan

Representation ID: 5819

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Alison Small

Representation Summary:

Strategic planning policies should be based on adopted national
policy rather than any draft consultation documents, which may change significantly before
they are finalised. The Local Plan may need to be revised during its production to reflect
legislative changes, and if these are material the changes must be subject to consultation

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Increase in housing requirements

Representation ID: 5821

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Alison Small

Representation Summary:

The respondent argues that development should serve the long-term public interest rather than short-term private interests or perceived land supply shortages. They express concern that Cheshire East Council may be pressured to release unsuitable or unsustainable sites before the new Local Plan is adopted. To address this, they call for an Interim Housing Policy Statement (IHPS) to provide clarity on housing delivery, safeguarded land release, regeneration priorities, and development expectations. They also recommend requiring realistic delivery timescales from developers. The respondent believes sufficient suitable sites, including safeguarded and brownfield land, exist to meet housing needs without significant Green Belt release.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Changes to Green Belt policy

Representation ID: 5824

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Alison Small

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports strong protection of Green Belt land, agricultural land, and ecological assets, arguing that development on greenfield sites should only proceed where environmental harm is clearly outweighed by public benefits. They emphasise the strategic role of the Green Belt in preventing urban sprawl, maintaining settlement separation, protecting countryside and historic settings, and supporting regeneration. Any Green Belt release should be justified by exceptional circumstances, consideration of alternatives, and assessment of cumulative impacts. The respondent advocates a brownfield-first approach, protection of biodiversity and productive farmland, caution over development in the Green Belt, and clear policies on Grey Belt assessment and Golden Rules delivery.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Brownfield development

Representation ID: 5826

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Alison Small

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports a strong brownfield-first strategy, arguing that previously developed land and urban regeneration should be prioritised ahead of releasing Green Belt and productive agricultural land. They contend that regenerating towns such as Crewe, Macclesfield and Cheshire East’s market towns would maximise existing infrastructure, support local businesses, increase town centre activity, meet housing needs, and reduce pressure on the countryside. To achieve this, they propose updating the Brownfield Register, seeking additional brownfield opportunities, addressing viability and contamination barriers through remediation funding, securing government support for land reclamation, and developing larger regeneration programmes that could attract investment and support social housing delivery.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Heritage, culture and natural environment

Representation ID: 5828

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Alison Small

Representation Summary:

The Cheshire and Warrington Local Nature Recovery Strategy should be cross referenced and included within the preparation of the Local Plan.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Settlements and rural-urban composition

Representation ID: 5829

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Alison Small

Representation Summary:

The Local Plan should continue to recognise the importance of
Cheshire East's rural communities.
Strategic development should strengthen rather than undermine the character, identity and
sustainability of villages and rural settlements. Development that fundamentally changes the
nature of rural communities should only be considered where there is compelling evidence
that all reasonable alternatives have been exhausted, and there is a genuine local area need.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Demographic mix

Representation ID: 5831

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Alison Small

Representation Summary:

The Local Plan should recognise the need to allocate sites for
housing to facilitate ‘downsizing’ for older residents, helping to free up activity in the
housing market and thus making better use of existing housing stock.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Local plan period

Representation ID: 5832

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Alison Small

Representation Summary:

The plan period needs to run from 2025 (to overlap with existing Strategy) as CEC originally proposed and run to 2045, 15 years after likely adoption date.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.