Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Protect Butterfly Bank search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Identifying and assessing sites

Representation ID: 2273

Received: 23/08/2026

Respondent: Protect Butterfly Bank

Representation Summary:

Protect Butterfly Bank objects to the potential allocation of Stockton Farm/Butterfly Bank (WM27, WM28, CFS26 246, HE274) for development, arguing that the site performs an important Green Belt function, is not “grey belt”, and contributes significantly to maintaining separation between Wilmslow and Alderley Edge. The representation raises concerns about flood risk within the Whitehall Brook catchment, landscape character, biodiversity, veteran trees, habitat connectivity, agricultural land loss, infrastructure capacity and transport sustainability. It advocates a brownfield-first approach, support for a Strategic Green Gap designation, and transparent site assessment. The respondent requests that robust evidence and cumulative impact assessments be completed before any allocation decisions are made.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Identifying and assessing sites

Representation ID: 2274

Received: 23/08/2026

Respondent: Protect Butterfly Bank

Representation Summary:

Please see our attached representation. Section 12 (Highways, Access and Sustainable Transport) is particularly relevant.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Identifying and assessing sites

Representation ID: 2275

Received: 23/08/2026

Respondent: Protect Butterfly Bank

Representation Summary:

Protect Butterfly Bank objects to the potential allocation of Stockton Farm/Butterfly Bank (WM27, WM28, CFS26 246, HE274) for development, arguing that the site performs an important Green Belt function, is not “grey belt”, and contributes significantly to maintaining separation between Wilmslow and Alderley Edge. The representation raises concerns about flood risk within the Whitehall Brook catchment, landscape character, biodiversity, veteran trees, habitat connectivity, agricultural land loss, infrastructure capacity and transport sustainability. It advocates a brownfield-first approach, support for a Strategic Green Gap designation, and transparent site assessment. The respondent requests that robust evidence and cumulative impact assessments be completed before any allocation decisions are made.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Identifying and assessing sites

Representation ID: 2276

Received: 23/08/2026

Respondent: Protect Butterfly Bank

Representation Summary:

Protect Butterfly Bank objects to the potential allocation of Stockton Farm/Butterfly Bank (WM27, WM28, CFS26 246, HE274) for development, arguing that the site performs an important Green Belt function, is not “grey belt”, and contributes significantly to maintaining separation between Wilmslow and Alderley Edge. The representation raises concerns about flood risk within the Whitehall Brook catchment, landscape character, biodiversity, veteran trees, habitat connectivity, agricultural land loss, infrastructure capacity and transport sustainability. It advocates a brownfield-first approach, support for a Strategic Green Gap designation, and transparent site assessment. The respondent requests that robust evidence and cumulative impact assessments be completed before any allocation decisions are made.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Identifying and assessing sites

Representation ID: 2278

Received: 23/08/2026

Respondent: Protect Butterfly Bank

Representation Summary:

Protect Butterfly Bank objects to the potential allocation of Stockton Farm/Butterfly Bank (WM27, WM28, CFS26 246, HE274) for development, arguing that the site performs an important Green Belt function, is not “grey belt”, and contributes significantly to maintaining separation between Wilmslow and Alderley Edge. The representation raises concerns about flood risk within the Whitehall Brook catchment, landscape character, biodiversity, veteran trees, habitat connectivity, agricultural land loss, infrastructure capacity and transport sustainability. It advocates a brownfield-first approach, support for a Strategic Green Gap designation, and transparent site assessment. The respondent requests that robust evidence and cumulative impact assessments be completed before any allocation decisions are made.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.