Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for Protect Butterfly Bank search
New searchComment
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Representation ID: 2273
Received: 23/08/2026
Respondent: Protect Butterfly Bank
Protect Butterfly Bank objects to the potential allocation of Stockton Farm/Butterfly Bank (WM27, WM28, CFS26 246, HE274) for development, arguing that the site performs an important Green Belt function, is not “grey belt”, and contributes significantly to maintaining separation between Wilmslow and Alderley Edge. The representation raises concerns about flood risk within the Whitehall Brook catchment, landscape character, biodiversity, veteran trees, habitat connectivity, agricultural land loss, infrastructure capacity and transport sustainability. It advocates a brownfield-first approach, support for a Strategic Green Gap designation, and transparent site assessment. The respondent requests that robust evidence and cumulative impact assessments be completed before any allocation decisions are made.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Representation ID: 2274
Received: 23/08/2026
Respondent: Protect Butterfly Bank
Please see our attached representation. Section 12 (Highways, Access and Sustainable Transport) is particularly relevant.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Representation ID: 2275
Received: 23/08/2026
Respondent: Protect Butterfly Bank
Protect Butterfly Bank objects to the potential allocation of Stockton Farm/Butterfly Bank (WM27, WM28, CFS26 246, HE274) for development, arguing that the site performs an important Green Belt function, is not “grey belt”, and contributes significantly to maintaining separation between Wilmslow and Alderley Edge. The representation raises concerns about flood risk within the Whitehall Brook catchment, landscape character, biodiversity, veteran trees, habitat connectivity, agricultural land loss, infrastructure capacity and transport sustainability. It advocates a brownfield-first approach, support for a Strategic Green Gap designation, and transparent site assessment. The respondent requests that robust evidence and cumulative impact assessments be completed before any allocation decisions are made.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Representation ID: 2276
Received: 23/08/2026
Respondent: Protect Butterfly Bank
Protect Butterfly Bank objects to the potential allocation of Stockton Farm/Butterfly Bank (WM27, WM28, CFS26 246, HE274) for development, arguing that the site performs an important Green Belt function, is not “grey belt”, and contributes significantly to maintaining separation between Wilmslow and Alderley Edge. The representation raises concerns about flood risk within the Whitehall Brook catchment, landscape character, biodiversity, veteran trees, habitat connectivity, agricultural land loss, infrastructure capacity and transport sustainability. It advocates a brownfield-first approach, support for a Strategic Green Gap designation, and transparent site assessment. The respondent requests that robust evidence and cumulative impact assessments be completed before any allocation decisions are made.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Representation ID: 2278
Received: 23/08/2026
Respondent: Protect Butterfly Bank
Protect Butterfly Bank objects to the potential allocation of Stockton Farm/Butterfly Bank (WM27, WM28, CFS26 246, HE274) for development, arguing that the site performs an important Green Belt function, is not “grey belt”, and contributes significantly to maintaining separation between Wilmslow and Alderley Edge. The representation raises concerns about flood risk within the Whitehall Brook catchment, landscape character, biodiversity, veteran trees, habitat connectivity, agricultural land loss, infrastructure capacity and transport sustainability. It advocates a brownfield-first approach, support for a Strategic Green Gap designation, and transparent site assessment. The respondent requests that robust evidence and cumulative impact assessments be completed before any allocation decisions are made.