Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for Mrs Andrea Jacobs search
New searchComment
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Representation ID: 2023
Received: 19/08/2026
Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs
A detailed traffic assessment must be completed as part of this exercise- current housing applications are being granted despite evidence and significant concerns that traffic levels are already unsustainable.
the identification of suitable sites should direct developers to first develop sites that have the least impact on the locality in terms of ecology, traffic and infrastructure, loss of biodiversity and agricultural land rather that just what appears more attractive and profitable to them,
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Green Belt
Representation ID: 2024
Received: 19/08/2026
Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs
This should also include the protection of the current Strategic Green Gap.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Strategic green gap
Representation ID: 2025
Received: 19/08/2026
Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs
It is imperative that this is retained if the character of the county is to be maintained
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Settlement hierarchy
Representation ID: 2026
Received: 19/08/2026
Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs
This hierarchy is critical to ensure that growth takes place in a controlled and sustainable manner that does not damage the characteristics of the county
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Spatial distribution
Representation ID: 2027
Received: 19/08/2026
Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs
Development needs to focus around existing settlements where infrastructure and employment opportunities already exist.
Much of the recent development has focused on 3-5 bedroom houses (with the exception of the current requirement for 30% affordable housing within each development) and little consideration for the needs of an ageing population who have no wish to live in a retirement home.
The requirements with respect to affordable housing being within all new developments fails to account for the need for such housing to be near employment opportunities/transport links
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Affordable housing
Representation ID: 2028
Received: 19/08/2026
Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs
The logic for the release of green belt for affordable housing is unclear. By the very nature such housing is likely to be occupied by persons/families on low incomes potentially with limited access to their own transport. Hence such housing should be developed in areas where there are clear employment opportunities with good access to public transport.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Housing standards
Representation ID: 2029
Received: 19/08/2026
Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs
Requirements for grey water recycling and harvesting should be explored as a condition of new developments.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Houses in Multiple Occupation
Representation ID: 2030
Received: 19/08/2026
Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs
the regulation of allowing buildings to be converted to HMOs should consider the exclusion of smaller housing units- allowing the conversion of these effectively removes what are the more affordable properties from the housing market
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Transport and infrastructure
Representation ID: 2031
Received: 19/08/2026
Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs
This is a key area- there has been significant expansion in the county as recognised in this document in both housing and employment opportunities with little investment in infrastructure- roads, health, education etc.. Accelerated growth without first putting more infrastructure in place risks significant problems and issues materialising.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Natural environment
Representation ID: 2032
Received: 19/08/2026
Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs
Whilst developers are at planners insistence including 'green areas' to support BNG there is little thought been given to the true ecological benefit of these areas-just planting a few more trees and hedges to does not compensate for the loss of a purely natural habitat and does not consider the long term sustainability of such areas- e.g look at the poor state of the supposed conservation areas on Stapeley Cronkinson Farm development- these are now basically large areas of weeds and brambles with little or no ecological value