Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Mrs Andrea Jacobs search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Identifying and assessing sites

Representation ID: 2023

Received: 19/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs

Representation Summary:

A detailed traffic assessment must be completed as part of this exercise- current housing applications are being granted despite evidence and significant concerns that traffic levels are already unsustainable.
the identification of suitable sites should direct developers to first develop sites that have the least impact on the locality in terms of ecology, traffic and infrastructure, loss of biodiversity and agricultural land rather that just what appears more attractive and profitable to them,

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Green Belt

Representation ID: 2024

Received: 19/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs

Representation Summary:

This should also include the protection of the current Strategic Green Gap.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Strategic green gap

Representation ID: 2025

Received: 19/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs

Representation Summary:

It is imperative that this is retained if the character of the county is to be maintained

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Settlement hierarchy

Representation ID: 2026

Received: 19/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs

Representation Summary:

This hierarchy is critical to ensure that growth takes place in a controlled and sustainable manner that does not damage the characteristics of the county

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Spatial distribution

Representation ID: 2027

Received: 19/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs

Representation Summary:

Development needs to focus around existing settlements where infrastructure and employment opportunities already exist.
Much of the recent development has focused on 3-5 bedroom houses (with the exception of the current requirement for 30% affordable housing within each development) and little consideration for the needs of an ageing population who have no wish to live in a retirement home.
The requirements with respect to affordable housing being within all new developments fails to account for the need for such housing to be near employment opportunities/transport links

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Affordable housing

Representation ID: 2028

Received: 19/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs

Representation Summary:

The logic for the release of green belt for affordable housing is unclear. By the very nature such housing is likely to be occupied by persons/families on low incomes potentially with limited access to their own transport. Hence such housing should be developed in areas where there are clear employment opportunities with good access to public transport.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Housing standards

Representation ID: 2029

Received: 19/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs

Representation Summary:

Requirements for grey water recycling and harvesting should be explored as a condition of new developments.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Houses in Multiple Occupation

Representation ID: 2030

Received: 19/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs

Representation Summary:

the regulation of allowing buildings to be converted to HMOs should consider the exclusion of smaller housing units- allowing the conversion of these effectively removes what are the more affordable properties from the housing market

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Transport and infrastructure

Representation ID: 2031

Received: 19/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs

Representation Summary:

This is a key area- there has been significant expansion in the county as recognised in this document in both housing and employment opportunities with little investment in infrastructure- roads, health, education etc.. Accelerated growth without first putting more infrastructure in place risks significant problems and issues materialising.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Natural environment

Representation ID: 2032

Received: 19/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Andrea Jacobs

Representation Summary:

Whilst developers are at planners insistence including 'green areas' to support BNG there is little thought been given to the true ecological benefit of these areas-just planting a few more trees and hedges to does not compensate for the loss of a purely natural habitat and does not consider the long term sustainability of such areas- e.g look at the poor state of the supposed conservation areas on Stapeley Cronkinson Farm development- these are now basically large areas of weeds and brambles with little or no ecological value

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.