Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Mrs Catherine Cheetham search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Brownfield development

Representation ID: 2197

Received: 23/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Cheetham

Representation Summary:

I appreciate the bind the Council is in in because of NPPF, however we need to avoid building on Green belt land. Brownfield first should always be the mantra and the Council should work harder to identify brown field sites. In my area of Macclesfield there are many areas which could be regenerated. No building on green belt land should be allowed whilst brownfield sites exist.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Changes to Green Belt policy

Representation ID: 2198

Received: 23/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Cheetham

Representation Summary:

This is difficult as the definition of grey belt is nuanced. It should not be that one individual from the Planning Inspectorate is allowed to determine whether land which previously held green belt status should be deemed 'greybelt'; I think a committee or panel should make such decisions to avoid personal bias. Preserving the setting and special character of historic towns is very difficult to prove when green belt is threatened.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Brownfield development

Representation ID: 2202

Received: 23/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Cheetham

Representation Summary:

This is crucial, but government and councils should do more to ensure this happens. Brownfield sites are often more expensive to build on than, for example, a green field. Developers should be required to prove that they have considered all brown field sites in an area before they are allowed even to submit outline plans to build on green belt land.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Economic growth

Representation ID: 2203

Received: 23/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Cheetham

Representation Summary:

Brownfield sites should be prioritised for this. In my area there are plenty of derelict mills, for example, which could be used to house modern industries if they are not used to build housing.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Natural environment

Representation ID: 2205

Received: 23/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Cheetham

Representation Summary:

In any planning decision, the local environment - including wildlife protections and other ecological considerations should be uppermost. No building on peatland, for example, should be allowed and protected species such as badgers, bats and birds should be just that - protected.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

National decision making policies

Representation ID: 2206

Received: 23/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Cheetham

Representation Summary:

Cheshire East is a large area within which local needs will vary. I hope this is taken in to consideration

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Strategic environmental assessment

Representation ID: 2207

Received: 23/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Cheetham

Representation Summary:

When experts such as the CPRE and Cheshire Wildlife are involved in decisions their expertise should not be ignored by the Planning Inspectorate

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Housing

Representation ID: 4938

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Cheetham

Representation Summary:

This representation argues that Cheshire East should prioritise brownfield development before considering additional greenfield or Green Belt land for housing. It suggests consulting residents on which green spaces should be protected and inviting suggestions for suitable brownfield sites. The submission highlights several potential redevelopment opportunities in Macclesfield, including former industrial mills on London Road, the former Covid vaccination centre near the railway station and long-derelict sites such as the former pub on Chestergate. It advocates concentrating new housing and apartments within the town centre, making better use of underused land while preserving valued open spaces and countryside areas.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Green Belt

Representation ID: 4939

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Cheetham

Representation Summary:

Cheshire East should do its absolute best to protect greenbelt land and should not allow developers to suggest that valuable greenbelt land which is also actively formed should be kept safe from development.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Transport and infrastructure

Representation ID: 4940

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Cheetham

Representation Summary:

In any building infrastructure should come first. We can’t get an appointment with our doctor so I have no idea what will happen when we have lot more residence living in proximity to myself. The roads in Macclesfield are often congested. There should be more buses which are freely available to all residents to encourage bus use.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.