Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Chris Taylor search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

How to respond

Representation ID: 5079

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Chris Taylor

Representation Summary:

First I would argue that the method for gaining feed back on the local plan site is over complex and likely restricts people commenting.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Natural environment

Representation ID: 5080

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Chris Taylor

Representation Summary:

Danes moss. I oppose any development that impacts on the natural moss and surrounding area. We need to live in conjunction with nature. This includes all areas where the natural environment will take a disproportionate hit I.e. Adlington.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Transport and infrastructure

Representation ID: 5081

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Chris Taylor

Representation Summary:

Schools, medical provision, lesuire and waste sites need to be expanded to respond to any increase.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Waste

Representation ID: 5082

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Chris Taylor

Representation Summary:

Schools, medical provision, lesuire and waste sites need to be expanded to respond to any increase.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Spatial distribution

Representation ID: 5083

Received: 27/08/2026

Respondent: Chris Taylor

Representation Summary:

Plans need to avoid over concentration of development in towns ( take Congleton absolute disgrace the concentration of block development there). Each town and village should take a proportion of required homes so that development is not centered in one place (Congleton model).

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.