Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for Chris Taylor search
New search
New search
Local plan scoping consultation
Representation Summary:
First I would argue that the method for gaining feed back on the local plan site is over complex and likely restricts people commenting.
Full text:
First I would argue that the method for gaining feed back on the local plan site is over complex and likely restricts people commenting.
1 In recent years It appears that developers have had the upper hand over local residents. That has to stop.
2 Danes moss. I oppose any development that impacts on the natural moss and surrounding area. We need to live in conjunction with nature. This includes all areas where the natural environment will take a disproportionate hit I.e. Adlington.
3 Plans need to avoid over concentration of development in towns ( take Congleton absolute disgrace the concentration of block development there). Each town and village should take a proportion of required homes so that development is not centered in one place (Congleton model).
4 Schools, medical provision, lesuire and waste sites need to be expanded to respond to any increase.
5 Plans need to avoid back of the envelope planning ( Take the stupid and dangerous roundabout on Chelford Road)
6 There needs to be an end to the council agreeing to plans and developers if they throw something in. Take the completely ridiculous road junction " improvement" on Moss lane/Congleton road. Now abandoned.
Don't rush
Don't destroy natural heritage
Deliver proportionately
Provide infrastructure
Avoid "Deals" with developers at the cost of local residents.
Server the link where the government can override local decisions
Local plan scoping consultation
Representation Summary:
Danes moss. I oppose any development that impacts on the natural moss and surrounding area. We need to live in conjunction with nature. This includes all areas where the natural environment will take a disproportionate hit I.e. Adlington.
Full text:
First I would argue that the method for gaining feed back on the local plan site is over complex and likely restricts people commenting.
1 In recent years It appears that developers have had the upper hand over local residents. That has to stop.
2 Danes moss. I oppose any development that impacts on the natural moss and surrounding area. We need to live in conjunction with nature. This includes all areas where the natural environment will take a disproportionate hit I.e. Adlington.
3 Plans need to avoid over concentration of development in towns ( take Congleton absolute disgrace the concentration of block development there). Each town and village should take a proportion of required homes so that development is not centered in one place (Congleton model).
4 Schools, medical provision, lesuire and waste sites need to be expanded to respond to any increase.
5 Plans need to avoid back of the envelope planning ( Take the stupid and dangerous roundabout on Chelford Road)
6 There needs to be an end to the council agreeing to plans and developers if they throw something in. Take the completely ridiculous road junction " improvement" on Moss lane/Congleton road. Now abandoned.
Don't rush
Don't destroy natural heritage
Deliver proportionately
Provide infrastructure
Avoid "Deals" with developers at the cost of local residents.
Server the link where the government can override local decisions
Local plan scoping consultation
Transport and infrastructure
Representation Summary:
Schools, medical provision, lesuire and waste sites need to be expanded to respond to any increase.
Full text:
First I would argue that the method for gaining feed back on the local plan site is over complex and likely restricts people commenting.
1 In recent years It appears that developers have had the upper hand over local residents. That has to stop.
2 Danes moss. I oppose any development that impacts on the natural moss and surrounding area. We need to live in conjunction with nature. This includes all areas where the natural environment will take a disproportionate hit I.e. Adlington.
3 Plans need to avoid over concentration of development in towns ( take Congleton absolute disgrace the concentration of block development there). Each town and village should take a proportion of required homes so that development is not centered in one place (Congleton model).
4 Schools, medical provision, lesuire and waste sites need to be expanded to respond to any increase.
5 Plans need to avoid back of the envelope planning ( Take the stupid and dangerous roundabout on Chelford Road)
6 There needs to be an end to the council agreeing to plans and developers if they throw something in. Take the completely ridiculous road junction " improvement" on Moss lane/Congleton road. Now abandoned.
Don't rush
Don't destroy natural heritage
Deliver proportionately
Provide infrastructure
Avoid "Deals" with developers at the cost of local residents.
Server the link where the government can override local decisions
Local plan scoping consultation
Representation Summary:
Schools, medical provision, lesuire and waste sites need to be expanded to respond to any increase.
Full text:
First I would argue that the method for gaining feed back on the local plan site is over complex and likely restricts people commenting.
1 In recent years It appears that developers have had the upper hand over local residents. That has to stop.
2 Danes moss. I oppose any development that impacts on the natural moss and surrounding area. We need to live in conjunction with nature. This includes all areas where the natural environment will take a disproportionate hit I.e. Adlington.
3 Plans need to avoid over concentration of development in towns ( take Congleton absolute disgrace the concentration of block development there). Each town and village should take a proportion of required homes so that development is not centered in one place (Congleton model).
4 Schools, medical provision, lesuire and waste sites need to be expanded to respond to any increase.
5 Plans need to avoid back of the envelope planning ( Take the stupid and dangerous roundabout on Chelford Road)
6 There needs to be an end to the council agreeing to plans and developers if they throw something in. Take the completely ridiculous road junction " improvement" on Moss lane/Congleton road. Now abandoned.
Don't rush
Don't destroy natural heritage
Deliver proportionately
Provide infrastructure
Avoid "Deals" with developers at the cost of local residents.
Server the link where the government can override local decisions
Local plan scoping consultation
Representation Summary:
Plans need to avoid over concentration of development in towns ( take Congleton absolute disgrace the concentration of block development there). Each town and village should take a proportion of required homes so that development is not centered in one place (Congleton model).
Full text:
First I would argue that the method for gaining feed back on the local plan site is over complex and likely restricts people commenting.
1 In recent years It appears that developers have had the upper hand over local residents. That has to stop.
2 Danes moss. I oppose any development that impacts on the natural moss and surrounding area. We need to live in conjunction with nature. This includes all areas where the natural environment will take a disproportionate hit I.e. Adlington.
3 Plans need to avoid over concentration of development in towns ( take Congleton absolute disgrace the concentration of block development there). Each town and village should take a proportion of required homes so that development is not centered in one place (Congleton model).
4 Schools, medical provision, lesuire and waste sites need to be expanded to respond to any increase.
5 Plans need to avoid back of the envelope planning ( Take the stupid and dangerous roundabout on Chelford Road)
6 There needs to be an end to the council agreeing to plans and developers if they throw something in. Take the completely ridiculous road junction " improvement" on Moss lane/Congleton road. Now abandoned.
Don't rush
Don't destroy natural heritage
Deliver proportionately
Provide infrastructure
Avoid "Deals" with developers at the cost of local residents.
Server the link where the government can override local decisions
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.