Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for Kathleen McNairney search
New search
New search
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Respondent: Kathleen McNairney
Representation Summary:
This representation strongly objects to the proposed large-scale housing development around Ashley, arguing that the area lacks the infrastructure needed to support significant growth. Concerns include unsuitable rural roads, narrow bridges, limited pavements and increased traffic, noise and air pollution. The submission highlights potentially severe impacts on wildlife, the environment and valued Green Belt countryside used for walking, cycling and recreation. It argues that such development would transform Ashley from a small rural village into an unsustainable new town. Additional concerns include limited public transport, loss of productive agricultural land and food-security implications. The proposal is described as harmful to residents, farmers and the wider countryside.
Full text:
I strongly object to the development of land around Ashley for an huge housing development .Ashley does not have the infrastructure to support such a huge development .
The country roads are winding and unsuitable for an increased volume of traffic. There are several narrow bridges and very few pavements. Widening them would incur increased traffic noise and air pollution for the whole area.
The ecological impact would be devastating on wildlife and the environment.
This Green Belt area is used by many families for walking and cycling and leisure. Many families walk their dogs in this area and it a countryside space between Greater Manchester and Trafford and the villages the town of Knutsford in East Cheshire.
Ashley is a small rural village which would develop into a new town and therefore violate sustainable development principles. Government and council tax data show more than 300000 homes in England officially classified as empty .Pursuing the use of them would be a start to alleviate the housing problem .
There is no public transport and the railway station has only one train every hour. The train line is used mostly for freight.
Ashley is a Green Belt area .Agricultural land is farmed and needed at a time when we should be considering food security , grown locally and supporting our farmers. This BMV should be protected land .
This is a preposterous proposed development which would ruin the whole countryside for local people, farmers, visitors enjoying fresh air
and wildlife.
Local plan scoping consultation
Respondent: Kathleen McNairney
Representation Summary:
This representation strongly objects to the proposed large-scale housing development around Ashley, arguing that the area lacks the infrastructure needed to support significant growth. Concerns include unsuitable rural roads, narrow bridges, limited pavements and increased traffic, noise and air pollution. The submission highlights potentially severe impacts on wildlife, the environment and valued Green Belt countryside used for walking, cycling and recreation. It argues that such development would transform Ashley from a small rural village into an unsustainable new town. Additional concerns include limited public transport, loss of productive agricultural land and food-security implications. The proposal is described as harmful to residents, farmers and the wider countryside.
Full text:
I strongly object to the development of land around Ashley for an huge housing development .Ashley does not have the infrastructure to support such a huge development .
The country roads are winding and unsuitable for an increased volume of traffic. There are several narrow bridges and very few pavements. Widening them would incur increased traffic noise and air pollution for the whole area.
The ecological impact would be devastating on wildlife and the environment.
This Green Belt area is used by many families for walking and cycling and leisure. Many families walk their dogs in this area and it a countryside space between Greater Manchester and Trafford and the villages the town of Knutsford in East Cheshire.
Ashley is a small rural village which would develop into a new town and therefore violate sustainable development principles. Government and council tax data show more than 300000 homes in England officially classified as empty .Pursuing the use of them would be a start to alleviate the housing problem .
There is no public transport and the railway station has only one train every hour. The train line is used mostly for freight.
Ashley is a Green Belt area .Agricultural land is farmed and needed at a time when we should be considering food security , grown locally and supporting our farmers. This BMV should be protected land .
This is a preposterous proposed development which would ruin the whole countryside for local people, farmers, visitors enjoying fresh air
and wildlife.
Local plan scoping consultation
Respondent: Kathleen McNairney
Representation Summary:
This representation strongly objects to the proposed large-scale housing development around Ashley, arguing that the area lacks the infrastructure needed to support significant growth. Concerns include unsuitable rural roads, narrow bridges, limited pavements and increased traffic, noise and air pollution. The submission highlights potentially severe impacts on wildlife, the environment and valued Green Belt countryside used for walking, cycling and recreation. It argues that such development would transform Ashley from a small rural village into an unsustainable new town. Additional concerns include limited public transport, loss of productive agricultural land and food-security implications. The proposal is described as harmful to residents, farmers and the wider countryside.
Full text:
I strongly object to the development of land around Ashley for an huge housing development .Ashley does not have the infrastructure to support such a huge development .
The country roads are winding and unsuitable for an increased volume of traffic. There are several narrow bridges and very few pavements. Widening them would incur increased traffic noise and air pollution for the whole area.
The ecological impact would be devastating on wildlife and the environment.
This Green Belt area is used by many families for walking and cycling and leisure. Many families walk their dogs in this area and it a countryside space between Greater Manchester and Trafford and the villages the town of Knutsford in East Cheshire.
Ashley is a small rural village which would develop into a new town and therefore violate sustainable development principles. Government and council tax data show more than 300000 homes in England officially classified as empty .Pursuing the use of them would be a start to alleviate the housing problem .
There is no public transport and the railway station has only one train every hour. The train line is used mostly for freight.
Ashley is a Green Belt area .Agricultural land is farmed and needed at a time when we should be considering food security , grown locally and supporting our farmers. This BMV should be protected land .
This is a preposterous proposed development which would ruin the whole countryside for local people, farmers, visitors enjoying fresh air
and wildlife.
Local plan scoping consultation
Respondent: Kathleen McNairney
Representation Summary:
This representation strongly objects to the proposed large-scale housing development around Ashley, arguing that the area lacks the infrastructure needed to support significant growth. Concerns include unsuitable rural roads, narrow bridges, limited pavements and increased traffic, noise and air pollution. The submission highlights potentially severe impacts on wildlife, the environment and valued Green Belt countryside used for walking, cycling and recreation. It argues that such development would transform Ashley from a small rural village into an unsustainable new town. Additional concerns include limited public transport, loss of productive agricultural land and food-security implications. The proposal is described as harmful to residents, farmers and the wider countryside.
Full text:
I strongly object to the development of land around Ashley for an huge housing development .Ashley does not have the infrastructure to support such a huge development .
The country roads are winding and unsuitable for an increased volume of traffic. There are several narrow bridges and very few pavements. Widening them would incur increased traffic noise and air pollution for the whole area.
The ecological impact would be devastating on wildlife and the environment.
This Green Belt area is used by many families for walking and cycling and leisure. Many families walk their dogs in this area and it a countryside space between Greater Manchester and Trafford and the villages the town of Knutsford in East Cheshire.
Ashley is a small rural village which would develop into a new town and therefore violate sustainable development principles. Government and council tax data show more than 300000 homes in England officially classified as empty .Pursuing the use of them would be a start to alleviate the housing problem .
There is no public transport and the railway station has only one train every hour. The train line is used mostly for freight.
Ashley is a Green Belt area .Agricultural land is farmed and needed at a time when we should be considering food security , grown locally and supporting our farmers. This BMV should be protected land .
This is a preposterous proposed development which would ruin the whole countryside for local people, farmers, visitors enjoying fresh air
and wildlife.
Local plan scoping consultation
Transport and infrastructure
Respondent: Kathleen McNairney
Representation Summary:
This representation strongly objects to the proposed large-scale housing development around Ashley, arguing that the area lacks the infrastructure needed to support significant growth. Concerns include unsuitable rural roads, narrow bridges, limited pavements and increased traffic, noise and air pollution. The submission highlights potentially severe impacts on wildlife, the environment and valued Green Belt countryside used for walking, cycling and recreation. It argues that such development would transform Ashley from a small rural village into an unsustainable new town. Additional concerns include limited public transport, loss of productive agricultural land and food-security implications. The proposal is described as harmful to residents, farmers and the wider countryside.
Full text:
I strongly object to the development of land around Ashley for an huge housing development .Ashley does not have the infrastructure to support such a huge development .
The country roads are winding and unsuitable for an increased volume of traffic. There are several narrow bridges and very few pavements. Widening them would incur increased traffic noise and air pollution for the whole area.
The ecological impact would be devastating on wildlife and the environment.
This Green Belt area is used by many families for walking and cycling and leisure. Many families walk their dogs in this area and it a countryside space between Greater Manchester and Trafford and the villages the town of Knutsford in East Cheshire.
Ashley is a small rural village which would develop into a new town and therefore violate sustainable development principles. Government and council tax data show more than 300000 homes in England officially classified as empty .Pursuing the use of them would be a start to alleviate the housing problem .
There is no public transport and the railway station has only one train every hour. The train line is used mostly for freight.
Ashley is a Green Belt area .Agricultural land is farmed and needed at a time when we should be considering food security , grown locally and supporting our farmers. This BMV should be protected land .
This is a preposterous proposed development which would ruin the whole countryside for local people, farmers, visitors enjoying fresh air
and wildlife.
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.
