Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for Mr Laurence Clarke search
New search
New search
Local plan scoping consultation
Respondent: Mr Laurence Clarke
Representation Summary:
The statement in Paragraph 4.6 that Cheshire East’s transport links make it easy to travel to and from other parts of the country is false and misleading. The poor road network in Cheshire East often makes travel difficult and time consuming. No major developments should be allowed until there has been significant investment in both road and rail infrastructure.
Full text:
Paragraph 4.6, especially the statement that Cheshire East’s transport links make it easy to travel to and from other parts of the country, is false and misleading. The poor road network in Cheshire East makes it difficult to access many destinations. For example, it usually takes at least 45 minutes just to reach the M6 motorway from Poynton when going south, with a similar time needed to reach the A500 in Stoke on Trent when travelling to the East Midlands. Travel by road from Poynton, Macclesfield and Wilmslow to Manchester can easily take up to an hour at “rush hour” with major congestion all the way into Stockport and Manchester.
Rail services are no better, with frequent cancellations, overcrowding and Sunday services often not running. Bus services are often limited and infrequent with limited destinations – for example, it is impossible to get directly by bus from Poynton to Disley, Wilmslow or Manchester Airport.
It would be more truthful to say that travel in Cheshire East is often difficult, frustrating and time consuming and no major development should be allowed until there has been significant investment in both road and rail infrastructure.
A public body should not be making false and misleading statements in an official document.
Local plan scoping consultation
Respondent: Mr Laurence Clarke
Representation Summary:
The existing hospital provision in the eastern part of Cheshire East is inadequate. Macclesfield General Hospital has severe capacity issues and long queues are routine in the Accident and Emergency Department. NHS England league tables confirm that the East Cheshire NHS Trust is Low Performing. There should be no new housing development in the eastern part of Cheshire East until these issues have been resolved and hospital capacity improved significantly to address both existing problems and any increase in population.
Full text:
The existing hospital provision in the eastern part of Cheshire East is inadequate. Macclesfield General Hospital has severe capacity issues and long queues are routine in the Accident and Emergency Department.
The recently published NHS England league table of NHS Trusts for Quarter 3 of 2025/26 identifies the East Cheshire NHS Trust as “Low Performing – the lowest category.” NHS England also note that East Cheshire has much the worst overall score of all the NHS Trusts in Northwest England.
East Cheshire NHS Trust has a series of poor scores in numerous categories. It is the very worst in England for:
• Percentage of cases where a patient waits 18 weeks or less for elective treatment,
• Difference between planned and actual 18 week performance; and
• The percentage of emergency attendances dealt with within 4 hours.
• East Cheshire NHS Trust is 119th out of 131 Trusts for Percentage of Patients waiting over 52 weeks for elective treatment.
The NHS England figures also show that, between December 2024 and November 2025, East Cheshire NHS Trust had 900 deaths compared to the expected figure of 700 – a rate over 28 per cent higher. The figures include patients who died in hospital as well as those who died within 30 days of discharge.
These figures demonstrate that there should be no new housing development in the eastern part of Cheshire East until these issues have been resolved and hospital capacity improved significantly.
Note there is no spare capacity in nearby areas – Stepping Hill Hospital in Stockport is also at full capacity, and Stockport Council are planning several thousand new homes in their new Local Plan.
Local plan scoping consultation
Pollution and Contamination
Respondent: Mr Laurence Clarke
Representation Summary:
The best way to avoid extra air and light pollution is to leave open land undeveloped. It is impossible to urbanise swathes of Cheshire East without significant increases in pollution.
Full text:
The best way to avoid extra air and light pollution is to leave open land undeveloped. It is impossible to urbanise swathes of Cheshire East without significant increases in pollution.
Local plan scoping consultation
Respondent: Mr Laurence Clarke
Representation Summary:
Building large housing estates on the edge of existing towns, some distance from most public facilities, will only encourage the use of private cars. The results of the recent Call for Sites suggest that most land put forward for development is some way from existing houses, shops and public facilities.
Full text:
Building large housing estates on the edge of existing towns, some distance from most public facilities, will only encourage the use of private cars. The results of the recent Call for Sites suggest that most land put forward for development is some way from existing houses, shops and public facilities.
Local plan scoping consultation
Respondent: Mr Laurence Clarke
Representation Summary:
The new Cheshire East Local Plan should take full account of planned developments just over the county boundary. Poynton borders Stockport MBC to the north and west. Stockport are planning several thousand houses, mainly on Green Belt land, around the towns of Hazel Grove, Bramhall and Woodford. These sites are close, in some cases right up to, the border with Cheshire East.
As well as extra traffic, there may be increased pressure on schools in Poynton and other nearby areas of Cheshire East, as Stockport MBC have under provided primary school places in their Woodford Garden Village development.
Full text:
The new Cheshire East Local Plan should take full account of planned developments just over the county boundary. Poynton borders Stockport MBC to the north and west. Stockport are planning several thousand houses, mainly on Green Belt land, around the towns of Hazel Grove, Bramhall and Woodford. These sites are close, in some cases right up to, the border with Cheshire East.
As well as extra traffic, there may be increased pressure on schools in Poynton and other nearby areas of Cheshire East, as Stockport MBC have under provided primary school places in their Woodford Garden Village development.
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Respondent: Mr Laurence Clarke
Representation Summary:
The Cheshire East Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) (2024) includes Poynton as one of fourteen priority areas where flood risk is significant. The SFRA confirms that Poynton is at risk from five distinct types of flooding.
This is a major constraint on development, and sites should not be allocated in flood risk areas.
Full text:
The Cheshire East Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) (2024) includes Poynton as one of fourteen priority areas where flood risk is significant. Poynton suffered severe flooding in both 2016 and 2019. The SFRA confirms that Poynton is at risk from numerous types of flooding:
• Fluvial Flooding from rivers and associated watercourses (Poynton Brook).
• Surface water risk – Poynton is identified as at high risk of surface water flooding.
• Groundwater flood risk – Poynton and surrounding area form one of the two areas of highest groundwater flood risk in the whole of Cheshire East.
• Flood risk from sewers – the SFRA names Poynton as an area where sewer flooding has occurred. Some sewers, for example on Coppice Road, are too narrow for existing levels of discharge and could not accommodate any new developments.
• Reservoir flood risk – from the Cheshire East owned ornamental reservoir at Poynton Pool. Cheshire East accept this is a significant risk and are planning significant work to improve the safety of Poynton Pool. However, it is not possible to eliminate this risk.
Poynton is the only area in Cheshire East to feature in every category of flood risk in the SFRA. Sites must not be allocated for development if:
• The site is in Flood Zones 2 or 3 or at risk from any type of flooding; or
• Building on the site could reduce absorption of rainwater or displace flooding downstream where it could inundate existing properties.
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.