Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Mr Laurence Clarke search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Economic contribution

Representation ID: 4662

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Laurence Clarke

Representation Summary:

The statement in Paragraph 4.6 that Cheshire East’s transport links make it easy to travel to and from other parts of the country is false and misleading. The poor road network in Cheshire East often makes travel difficult and time consuming. No major developments should be allowed until there has been significant investment in both road and rail infrastructure.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Health and wellbeing

Representation ID: 4682

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Laurence Clarke

Representation Summary:

The existing hospital provision in the eastern part of Cheshire East is inadequate. Macclesfield General Hospital has severe capacity issues and long queues are routine in the Accident and Emergency Department. NHS England league tables confirm that the East Cheshire NHS Trust is Low Performing. There should be no new housing development in the eastern part of Cheshire East until these issues have been resolved and hospital capacity improved significantly to address both existing problems and any increase in population.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Pollution and Contamination

Representation ID: 4687

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Laurence Clarke

Representation Summary:

The best way to avoid extra air and light pollution is to leave open land undeveloped. It is impossible to urbanise swathes of Cheshire East without significant increases in pollution.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Active Travel

Representation ID: 4699

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Laurence Clarke

Representation Summary:

Building large housing estates on the edge of existing towns, some distance from most public facilities, will only encourage the use of private cars. The results of the recent Call for Sites suggest that most land put forward for development is some way from existing houses, shops and public facilities.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Planning for growth

Representation ID: 4709

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Laurence Clarke

Representation Summary:

The new Cheshire East Local Plan should take full account of planned developments just over the county boundary. Poynton borders Stockport MBC to the north and west. Stockport are planning several thousand houses, mainly on Green Belt land, around the towns of Hazel Grove, Bramhall and Woodford. These sites are close, in some cases right up to, the border with Cheshire East.

As well as extra traffic, there may be increased pressure on schools in Poynton and other nearby areas of Cheshire East, as Stockport MBC have under provided primary school places in their Woodford Garden Village development.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Identifying and assessing sites

Representation ID: 4736

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Laurence Clarke

Representation Summary:

The Cheshire East Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) (2024) includes Poynton as one of fourteen priority areas where flood risk is significant. The SFRA confirms that Poynton is at risk from five distinct types of flooding.
This is a major constraint on development, and sites should not be allocated in flood risk areas.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.