Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Mr Nigel Naden search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Identifying and assessing sites

Representation ID: 4369

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Nigel Naden

Representation Summary:

Many of the sites in this area have been comprehensively reviewed in the new towns Strategic Environmental Assessment and have already been found to be strategically unsuitable for development on a number of grounds.

Furthermore, whilst I understand the need for development, every effort must be taken to protect our green belt and green spaces. We live amongst nature and green spaces are vital to local habitats and mental wellbeing.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Green Belt

Representation ID: 4370

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Nigel Naden

Representation Summary:

Many of the sites in this area have been comprehensively reviewed in the new towns Strategic Environmental Assessment and have already been found to be strategically unsuitable for development on a number of grounds.

Furthermore, whilst I understand the need for development, every effort must be taken to protect our green belt and green spaces. We live amongst nature and green spaces are vital to local habitats and mental wellbeing.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Green Belt

Representation ID: 4371

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Nigel Naden

Representation Summary:

Please do not use Grey belt as a way of distroying greenbelt

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Development in the countryside

Representation ID: 4372

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Nigel Naden

Representation Summary:

Many of the sites in this area have been comprehensively reviewed in the new towns Strategic Environmental Assessment and have already been found to be strategically unsuitable for development on a number of grounds.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Affordable housing

Representation ID: 4375

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Nigel Naden

Representation Summary:

"National policy changes place greater emphasis on delivering affordable housing, particularly those for social rent, and may require higher levels of affordable housing on sites released from the Green Belt" How utterly ridiculous. By nature, more affordable developments require reduced construction costs. Building on greenbelt, which is typically remote and underdeveloped, entails not only higher infrastructure costs but also higher living costs for residents. Surely, the use of brownfield sites makes greater sense for low-cost development.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.