Local plan scoping consultation

Comment

Representation ID: 3413

Received: 30/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Leanne Pickup

I strongly object to the proposed development on land between Ryecroft Lane
and Pavement Lane due to its significant impact on local infrastructure and the
environment. The surrounding road network is already under pressure and lacks
capacity to accommodate increased traffic, leading to congestion, road safety
concerns, noise, and air pollution. Local schools, GP surgeries, and other essential
services are stretched and would face additional demand. The development would also
result in the loss of greenfield land, harm biodiversity, fragment wildlife habitats, reduce
natural drainage, increase surface water runoff and flood risk, and weaken the rural
character of the area.

Comment

Representation ID: 3417

Received: 30/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Leanne Pickup

I object to the allocation of Land north of Town Lane, Mobberley for housing
development. This site lies within a sensitive rural area where significant development
would erode the village's character, openness and separation from surrounding
settlements. The proposal would place additional pressure on already constrained
roads, increasing traffic, congestion and road safety concerns. Development of this
scale risks harm to biodiversity, hedgerows and wildlife habitats that contribute
to the local environment. Existing infrastructure, including schools, healthcare services
and utilities, may be unable to accommodate further growth. Priority should be given to
more sustainable brownfield locations before releasing countryside land.

Comment

Representation ID: 3419

Received: 30/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Leanne Pickup

I object to the proposed housing development at Land East/West of Pepper Street due
to the lack of infrastructure required to support substantial residential growth. Local
roads already experience congestion and would be unable to accommodate the
significant increase in traffic generated by the development. Public transport provision
in the area is limited, with a lack of realistic alternatives to
private car use for commuting, education, healthcare, and daily activities. This reliance
on cars would worsen congestion and environmental impacts. Existing schools,
healthcare services, and community facilities are also under pressure, making the
proposal unsustainable without major infrastructure investment.

Comment

Representation ID: 3421

Received: 30/08/2026

Respondent: Mrs Leanne Pickup

I object to the allocation of land between the railway and Smith Lane for housing
development because of the harm it would cause to the village character and local
identity. The site forms part of the rural setting that distinguishes the village from
surrounding urban areas, contributing to its unique sense of place. Development
would introduce a substantial area of housing that is out of keeping with the existing
character of the settlement. The
loss of open countryside would diminish views and the attractive
environment enjoyed by residents. This proposal would fundamentally alter the village’s
character and erode its distinctiveness.