Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for Keith Nixon search
New searchComment
Local plan scoping consultation
Changes to Green Belt policy
Representation ID: 3008
Received: 28/08/2026
Respondent: Keith Nixon
The definition of 'grey belt' seems entirely arbritary and is used by developers to smash through new developments. I'd like to see this definition eliminated.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Increase in housing requirements
Representation ID: 3009
Received: 28/08/2026
Respondent: Keith Nixon
I would like to see a pause on the current housebuilding applications across Cheshire East until this plan has been properly assessed. The current deluge of applications feels like a Wild West gold rush, with developers throwing in anything they can. I would like to see the housing plan co-ordinated with the upcoming mayoral powers. Around where I am is a focus by housebuilders on high value properties on green belt - affecting farming, wildlife and the environment for profit.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Brownfield development
Representation ID: 3011
Received: 28/08/2026
Respondent: Keith Nixon
Brownfield must lead the charge in housebuilding - the issue is developers don't want to spend the money on brownfield sites, greenbelt is way cheaper (as the developers of the Adlington Estate have said themselves). They should not be given the wiggle room. Greenbelt should be last choice and only in exceptional circumstances).
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Heritage, culture and natural environment
Representation ID: 3012
Received: 28/08/2026
Respondent: Keith Nixon
And all of these aspects should be protected - farmland, green belt, SSSIs and so on. Once these are gone, they aren't coming back.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Local plan period
Representation ID: 3013
Received: 28/08/2026
Respondent: Keith Nixon
The problem with taking so long to implement this plan - 2029 - means the previously referred to Wild West of housebuilding continues unabated. The damage this could wreak, unchecked, could be substantial (look at Adlington, Woodford and all the applications just around there). We need either a pause or a highly considered approach beforehand - and these decisions must be local, having a planning authority (such as with Bloor's triple appeal for building between Prestbury and Macc) cannot take precedence. Oterhwise, what is the point of Andy Burnham's 'local power' policy?
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Representation ID: 3014
Received: 28/08/2026
Respondent: Keith Nixon
All I'll say again is the wild west nature of applications to build is out of control.
Comment
Local plan scoping consultation
Green Belt
Representation ID: 3015
Received: 28/08/2026
Respondent: Keith Nixon
Green belt is absolutely critical - stop allowing the grey area from grey belt. It's a ridiculous development that should be halted.