Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Keith Nixon search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Changes to Green Belt policy

Representation ID: 3008

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Keith Nixon

Representation Summary:

The definition of 'grey belt' seems entirely arbritary and is used by developers to smash through new developments. I'd like to see this definition eliminated.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Increase in housing requirements

Representation ID: 3009

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Keith Nixon

Representation Summary:

I would like to see a pause on the current housebuilding applications across Cheshire East until this plan has been properly assessed. The current deluge of applications feels like a Wild West gold rush, with developers throwing in anything they can. I would like to see the housing plan co-ordinated with the upcoming mayoral powers. Around where I am is a focus by housebuilders on high value properties on green belt - affecting farming, wildlife and the environment for profit.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Brownfield development

Representation ID: 3011

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Keith Nixon

Representation Summary:

Brownfield must lead the charge in housebuilding - the issue is developers don't want to spend the money on brownfield sites, greenbelt is way cheaper (as the developers of the Adlington Estate have said themselves). They should not be given the wiggle room. Greenbelt should be last choice and only in exceptional circumstances).

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Heritage, culture and natural environment

Representation ID: 3012

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Keith Nixon

Representation Summary:

And all of these aspects should be protected - farmland, green belt, SSSIs and so on. Once these are gone, they aren't coming back.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Local plan period

Representation ID: 3013

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Keith Nixon

Representation Summary:

The problem with taking so long to implement this plan - 2029 - means the previously referred to Wild West of housebuilding continues unabated. The damage this could wreak, unchecked, could be substantial (look at Adlington, Woodford and all the applications just around there). We need either a pause or a highly considered approach beforehand - and these decisions must be local, having a planning authority (such as with Bloor's triple appeal for building between Prestbury and Macc) cannot take precedence. Oterhwise, what is the point of Andy Burnham's 'local power' policy?

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Identifying and assessing sites

Representation ID: 3014

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Keith Nixon

Representation Summary:

All I'll say again is the wild west nature of applications to build is out of control.

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Green Belt

Representation ID: 3015

Received: 28/08/2026

Respondent: Keith Nixon

Representation Summary:

Green belt is absolutely critical - stop allowing the grey area from grey belt. It's a ridiculous development that should be halted.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.