Local plan scoping consultation

To whom it may concern,

I am writing to formally register my objection to the inclusion of the 291.03 Hectare land submission around Ashley in the Cheshire East Local Plan/SHELAA

1. Conflict with Green Belt Policy ( North Cheshire Green Belt & Wash- Over Status )
. Wash - Over Green Belt:
The parish of Ashley is designated as “ Green Belt” - the most protective form of rural Green Belt classification.
. Regional Strategic Buffer : established in the 1950s specifically to prevent urban sprawl, Ashley forms the crucial narrow green buffer separating South Manchester and Trafford (Hale,Hale Barns, Altrincham) from villages and towns in Cheshire East (Mobberley, Knutsford )

. Failure of the national” Grey Belt “Test : Under national policy, Green Belt Land can only be considered for release if it meets the definition of Grey Belt, (previously developed Brownfield land or land that makes a negligible contribution to Green Belt purposes). Open ,working farmland across Ashley fails this test.

. Direct Conflict with Core Green Belt purposes (NPPF):
. Purpose A (Check Unrestricted Sprawl ) Serves as the primary barrier preventing the Manchester conurbation from expanding southwards..
.Purpose B ( Prevent Towns Merging ): Building across these 291.03 hectares would physically merge Greater Manchester settlements with Cheshire villages and towns.
.Purpose C ( Safeguard the Countryside ): Protects active, open agricultural land from suburban encroachment. Protecting this land aligns with national policy to preserve prime agricultural resources.

2. Sustainable Settlement Hierarchy: Ashley is a small, rural parish with very little public transport, primary infrastructure, medical facilities, or local employment. Allocating large scale development here violates sustainable development principles ,which require growth to be focused on Tier1 and Tier 2 urban centres.

3.: Highways and Safety: The surrounding rural road network, constrained by narrow railway bridges and single lane pinch points, cannot safely accommodate thousands of additional vehicle movements towards the A538 and M 56.

4. inadequate Rail Connections : Ashley train station cannot be considered a well connected transit hub. It currently operates at a low frequency of just one train per hour in each direction at maximum. Furthermore, with the proposed new station of Cheadle now likely to proceed, service models indicate that Ashley service frequency could be reduced further to just one train every two hours, rendering it wholly incapable of supporting sustainable commuter demand.

5. The land falls directly within flight path operational noise controls and birdstrike hazard safety zones making high density housing and sustainable.

6 Drainage and Utilities: the area like deep sewer, grid, and surface water drainage capacity, presenting high surface water flood risk to the River Bollin catchment.

7 Loss of High Grade Agricultural Land (BMV): Independent soil survey (including HS2 phase 2B data) confirm the land contains Grade 2 and subgrade 3a Best and Most Versatile (BMV) agricultural land, which national policy protects for food security.

8 .Environmental Heritage Harm : Development would cause irreparable harm to the Bollin Valley and Parklands LLD, Rostherne/ Tatton Park LLD, Cotterill Clough Nature Reserve, ancient Woodlands, protected species corridors, and the setting of 19 Grade 2 listed buildings (including Ashley Hall)

Tatton Estates see this as a money making exercise without any consideration to the devastation caused to communities. Our farmers are already being driven from their land. Without Farmers there is no food . I fail to understand how Cheshire East Council could possibly even consider this proposal.

I request that Cheshire East Council formally classify this 291.03 Hector area (12 adjoining site totalling 291.03 ha) as unsuitable and undeliverable in the SHELAA assessment.
Yours Sincerely,

Mrs Anne Marie Aylmer