Local plan scoping consultation

Mobberley was greatly affected by the buiding of Runway 2, therefore a large amount of possible development land has already been given up to Manchester Airport.
Therefore CEC accepting further sites in Mobberley's already depleted land stock is not acceptable and especially for a small rural village.
Poor infrastructure such as Mobberley railway station not being near the village centre, infrequent and unreliable bus service, badly maintained lanes, oversubscribed school, long waiting times for GP appointments etc.
As CEC are aware, Mobberley cannot be built on in certain areas because of the noise and pollution from aircraft before taking into account the additional burden of newly built houses bringing more traffic, car pollution, light pollution etc.

In Cheshire East Council’s Mobberley Settlement Report published in August 2020, pages 49 to 53 contain a summary of the value of the 'Land off Ryecroft Lane reference MB08' towards the Five Principles of Green Belt. The report states that the 'Land off Ryecroft Lane MB08' makes a Major Contribution to providing an essential gap to prevent the merging of Mobberley and Knutsford and development of it would significantly reduce the actual and perceived gap between the settlements.
However, this piece of land has been included as a site submission on Cheshire East's Local Plan Housing and Development. If this is the case, why is this piece of land even being considered?

Sustainable communities are of paramount importance when formulating a local plan.
The ability for communities to be able to access space for their well being is imperative. Housing targets are secondary to a community's mind and body well being.
New homes need employment, schools, good transport links, GP surgeries, reliable gas, electric and water supplies which all go towards building a community that can thrive with plenty of open spaces and no urban sprawl.

The new local plan is merely facilitating builders to go on a speculating mission on certain plots of land without restraint. This approach merely blights large areas of Cheshire to be potentially built on.
Brownfield sites should be released to builders first, before any Green Belt land is even considered to be released.

If Cheshire East reclassifies some of Mobberley's Green Belt land to be Grey Belt land, will there be procedures for that reclassification to be challenged?
Under the Grey Belt regime, how will this affect unrestricted sprawl and ribbon development and how will this be measured to prevent neighbouring towns/villages merging into one another?
As a matter of principal, Green Belt should only be released where all available Brown Field sites have been taken up for building. Green Belt prevents urban sprawl, protects the identity of settlements, supports biodiversity and provides recreational opportunities.

As my previous comments the Land between Ryecroft Lane & Pavement Lane Ref: CFS26 373 creates a ‘significant/major’ contribution to the greenbelt corridor between Mobberley and Knutsford (as accessed in your 2020 ED37 Report) to prevent 2 settlements from merging. I therefore strongly feel that any part of this land should not be considered for any development in the future and should remain as designated ’Greenbelt’ for farming purposes.

The Land between Ryecroft Lane & Pavement Lane Ref: CFS26 373 creates a ‘significant/major’ contribution to the greenbelt corridor between Mobberley and Knutsford (as accessed in your Mobberley Settlement ED37 Report 2020) to prevent 2 settlements from merging. I therefore strongly feel that any part of this land should not be considered for any development in the future and should remain as designated ’Greenbelt’ for farming purposes.