Local plan scoping consultation

Search representations

Results for Ms Natalie Jones search

New search New search

Comment

Local plan scoping consultation

Spatial distribution

Representation ID: 1660

Received: 15/08/2026

Respondent: Ms Natalie Jones

Representation Summary:

I completely oppose the proposal to treat Sutton and Langley as extensions of Macclesfield. These are distinct rural villages with their own identities, communities and character, and they should not be absorbed into the urban area simply to facilitate further housing growth. This approach risks eroding the separation between Macclesfield and the surrounding countryside and could lead to significant development that would fundamentally change the character of these villages. The Council should protect the individuality of Sutton and Langley and ensure that housing growth does not come at the expense of established communities, countryside and local infrastructure.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.