Local plan scoping consultation

Comment

Representation ID: 1406

Received: 09/08/2026

Respondent: Mr Matthew Grandage

I formally object to the 291.03-hectare Ashley submission (12 sites) in the Cheshire East
SHELAA. These sites must be classified as Unsuitable &
Undeliverable
Green Belt Breach: As strategic "wash-over" Green Belt preventing sprawl between
Greater Manchester and Cheshire, it fails national "Grey Belt" release criteria. BMV Agricultural Loss: Irreparably destroys Grade 2 and 3a Best and Most Versatile
farmland protected for food security.
Hierarchy & Infrastructure: Unsustainable rural location lacking transport, utilities,
surface-water drainage, and basic services.
Heritage & Safety Harm: Conflicts with aviation safety zones, exacerbates River Bollin flood risks, and damages ancient woodlands and 19 Listed Buildings.

Comment

Representation ID: 4412

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Matthew Grandage

I object to the proposed mixed-use development on Land North of Station Road. While
regeneration can bring benefits, this site is unsuitable due to the increase in traffic
congestion, pressure on local infrastructure, and loss of open space. Existing roads,
schools, healthcare services and public transport are already under strain and there is
insufficient evidence that the necessary improvements can be delivered in a timely
manner. The development would also have an adverse impact on the character of the
area, reducing the separation between built-up areas and harming local amenity.
Alternative brownfield sites should be prioritised before releasing for
development.

Comment

Representation ID: 4413

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Matthew Grandage

I object to the allocation of land between the railway and Smith Lane for housing
development. The site is poorly positioned for significant residential growth due to its
proximity to the railway, which may result in increased noise, disturbance, and reduced
residential amenity for future occupants. Development would also place additional
pressure on local roads, services, and infrastructure that are already stretched. The loss
of open land would adversely affect the character of the area and could have negative
impacts on local wildlife and biodiversity. Alternative sites should be prioritised before
this location is considered for housing

Comment

Representation ID: 4437

Received: 01/09/2026

Respondent: Mr Matthew Grandage

I object to the proposed allocation of Land West of Smith Lane for economy and employment uses. This would generate substantial additional traffic from
Employee commuting, deliveries, service vehicles & visitors, placing increased
pressure on local roads that are already constrained at peak times. This is likely to result in greater congestion, longer journey times & increased road safety concerns for residents and businesses. The site's location is not well suited to intensive employment use, and there is insufficient evidence that the economic benefits would outweigh adverse impacts on transport infrastructure, local amenity and the character of surrounding rural area