Local plan scoping consultation
Search representations
Results for George E Broadhurst search
New search
New search
Local plan scoping consultation
Identifying and assessing sites
Respondent: George E Broadhurst
Representation Summary:
Brownfield land should be prioritised ahead of greenfield development and that the remaining gap between Nantwich, Willaston and Wistaston should be afforded greater protection, including potential Green Belt designation. Concerns are raised regarding the delivery of housing land supply, the cumulative loss of countryside, farmland, habitats and trees, and the need to fully account for existing permissions and residential conversions. There are existing pressures on local infrastructure, including schools, healthcare services, highways, drainage and sewerage systems. Overall, future development should be guided by identified local housing needs rather than developer-led interests.
Full text:
General Comments
1. Brownfield sites should be developed before greenfield land is considered.
2. What remains of the green gap between Nantwich, Willaston and Wistaston should be reclassified as Green Belt to protect it from further development.
3. The five-year housing land supply issue, which is being exploited by developers, should be addressed urgently. For example, planning consents could require developments to be completed within five years or risk being revoked.
4. Cheshire East has contributed significantly towards addressing the so-called housing shortage over the last 10 years or so. A huge number of housing and commercial developments have been built across the Cheshire countryside, resulting in the loss of farmland, wildlife habitats and mature trees, all of which are important to the environment and the fight against climate change.
5. Existing planning permissions and conversions to residential use should be fully taken into account, including developments such as Rail House and the conversion of empty shops and other buildings into homes.
6. Local schools, doctors and dentists are already struggling to cope with the increased demand from a growing population.
7. Road traffic has increased significantly, putting considerable pressure on the existing road network, which is already heavily congested.
8. Existing drainage and sewerage systems are already under significant strain from the additional demand.
9. Developers are ultimately building houses for profit. Planning decisions should therefore focus on genuine local housing need rather than simply allowing further development.
Local plan scoping consultation
Respondent: George E Broadhurst
Representation Summary:
Brownfield sites should be developed before greenfield land is considered.
What remains of the green gap between Nantwich, Willaston and Wistaston should be reclassified as Green Belt to protect it from further development.
Full text:
General Comments
1. Brownfield sites should be developed before greenfield land is considered.
2. What remains of the green gap between Nantwich, Willaston and Wistaston should be reclassified as Green Belt to protect it from further development.
3. The five-year housing land supply issue, which is being exploited by developers, should be addressed urgently. For example, planning consents could require developments to be completed within five years or risk being revoked.
4. Cheshire East has contributed significantly towards addressing the so-called housing shortage over the last 10 years or so. A huge number of housing and commercial developments have been built across the Cheshire countryside, resulting in the loss of farmland, wildlife habitats and mature trees, all of which are important to the environment and the fight against climate change.
5. Existing planning permissions and conversions to residential use should be fully taken into account, including developments such as Rail House and the conversion of empty shops and other buildings into homes.
6. Local schools, doctors and dentists are already struggling to cope with the increased demand from a growing population.
7. Road traffic has increased significantly, putting considerable pressure on the existing road network, which is already heavily congested.
8. Existing drainage and sewerage systems are already under significant strain from the additional demand.
9. Developers are ultimately building houses for profit. Planning decisions should therefore focus on genuine local housing need rather than simply allowing further development.
Local plan scoping consultation
Respondent: George E Broadhurst
Representation Summary:
The five-year housing land supply issue, which is being exploited by developers, should be addressed urgently. For example, planning consents could require developments to be completed within five years or risk being revoked.
Cheshire East has contributed significantly towards addressing the so-called housing shortage over the last 10 years or so. A huge number of housing and commercial developments have been built across the Cheshire countryside, resulting in the loss of farmland, wildlife habitats and mature trees, all of which are important to the environment and the fight against climate change. Existing planning permissions and conversions to residential use should be fully taken into account, including developments such as Rail House and the conversion of empty shops and other buildings into homes.
Local schools, doctors and dentists are already struggling to cope with the increased demand from a growing population.
Road traffic has increased significantly, putting considerable pressure on the existing road network, which is already heavily congested.
Existing drainage and sewerage systems are already under significant strain from the additional demand.
Developers are ultimately building houses for profit. Planning decisions should therefore focus on genuine local housing need rather than simply allowing further development.
Full text:
General Comments
1. Brownfield sites should be developed before greenfield land is considered.
2. What remains of the green gap between Nantwich, Willaston and Wistaston should be reclassified as Green Belt to protect it from further development.
3. The five-year housing land supply issue, which is being exploited by developers, should be addressed urgently. For example, planning consents could require developments to be completed within five years or risk being revoked.
4. Cheshire East has contributed significantly towards addressing the so-called housing shortage over the last 10 years or so. A huge number of housing and commercial developments have been built across the Cheshire countryside, resulting in the loss of farmland, wildlife habitats and mature trees, all of which are important to the environment and the fight against climate change.
5. Existing planning permissions and conversions to residential use should be fully taken into account, including developments such as Rail House and the conversion of empty shops and other buildings into homes.
6. Local schools, doctors and dentists are already struggling to cope with the increased demand from a growing population.
7. Road traffic has increased significantly, putting considerable pressure on the existing road network, which is already heavily congested.
8. Existing drainage and sewerage systems are already under significant strain from the additional demand.
9. Developers are ultimately building houses for profit. Planning decisions should therefore focus on genuine local housing need rather than simply allowing further development.
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.