Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Comment

First Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 14

Received: 14/05/2025

Respondent: Wybunbury Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Wybunbury Parish Council would like you to consider adding the following buildings to the Local List as they have local significance in the area:-

Red Lion, 5 Main Road, Wybunbury. CW5 7NA
Wybunbury Village Hall, 51 Main Rd, Wybunbury CW5 7LY
Methodist Chapel, 3 Wybunbury Rd CW5 7JF
Boars Head, London Road, Nantwich CW5 7LA

Full text:

Dear Planning Policy,

Wybunbury Parish Council would like you to consider adding the following buildings to the Local List as they have local significance in the area:-

Red Lion, 5 Main Road, Wybunbury. CW5 7NA
Wybunbury Village Hall, 51 Main Rd, Wybunbury CW5 7LY
Methodist Chapel, 3 Wybunbury Rd CW5 7JF
Boars Head, London Road, Nantwich CW5 7LA

Kind regards
Muna

Mrs Muna Clough
Parish Clerk and Responsible Financial Officer

Comment

First Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 15

Received: 15/05/2025

Respondent: Goostrey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The proposed process seems to put the onus on the proposer to provide evidence that a building is an NDHA and therefore should go on the Local List. But there are many examples where CEC Built Heritage have already defined buildings as NDHA in response to Planning Applications or Appeals. In such cases I suggest they are automatically added to the Local List?

Full text:

Dear Sirs
Here is my comment on the SPD Consultation. The proposed process seems to put the onus on the proposer to provide evidence that a building is an NDHA and therefore should go on the Local List. But there are many examples where CEC Built Heritage have already defined buildings as NDHA in response to Planning Applications or Appeals. I give an example below. In such cases I suggest they are automatically added to the Local List? It would seem unnecessarily beauractratic to find Built Heritage's own decision and evidence on the CE Planning Portal and then present it back to them to prove what they have already decided?
Kind Regards
Ken Morris
Goostrey Parish Council
________________________________________

As an example, I attach a document that CEC Built Heritage wrote in response to Planning Application 23/3015C for the Red Lion in Goostrey in which CEC Built Heritage have written the following: "In addition, it appears on the Cheshire Tithe Map and as such can be considered as a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA) as defined in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). The local Parish Council agree that it is an NDHA". It appears in the Goostrey Neighbourhood Plan as an NDHA. The Applicant's own expert Heritage Statement accepts that it is an NDHA (also attached). The subsequent refusal of the Planning Application was upheld by the inspector in Appeal Number 3344957 (also attached) in which the Inspector writes in para 6 :

6. "The main parties do not dispute that the appeal building should be considered a NDHA. From the evidence before me and my site observations, I have no reason to reach an alternative view. I find the significance of this NDHA, insofar as this appeal is concerned, to derive from its age, character, setting and historic relationship with the nearby Grade II* Listed St Luke’s Church and Grade II Listed Church Cottages which are within the oldest part of the village."

My question is : Given that the Applicant's Heritage expert, and CEC Built Heritage and the Parish Council and the Planning Inspector have all agreed that the Red Lion (now Space Invader) is an NDHA - can it be automatically added to the Local List, without going through the whole assessment process again? There are a number of others very similar in Goostrey.

Many Thanks
Regards
Cllr Ken Morris
Goostrey Parish Council

Comment

First Draft Local List Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 19

Received: 09/06/2025

Respondent: Protect Lindow Residents Group

Representation Summary:

This submission is on behalf of the Protect Lindow residents group who are campaigning to return the site, LPS 59, back to green belt due to its ecological and archeological importance. This site should be added to the local list to recognise its archeological significance due to the high potential (because of its geology) that it contains "bog bodies" like Lindow Man. It also contains distinctive moss room that date back to the middle ages when peat was being cut. A similar landscape north of Row of Trees is listed in the sites and monuments record (SMR 1393).

Full text:

This submission is on behalf of the Protect Lindow residents group who are campaigning to return the site, LPS 59, back to green belt due to its ecological and archeological importance. This site should be added to the local list to recognise its archeological significance due to the high potential (because of its geology) that it contains "bog bodies" like Lindow Man. It also contains distinctive moss room that date back to the middle ages when peat was being cut. A similar landscape north of Row of Trees is listed in the sites and monuments record (SMR 1393).