7.4 While this paragraph offers some clarity if a traditional approach is adopted, a contemporary style is left entirely to the aesthetic judgement of the applicant/architect. Blending contemporary with a building listed for its significance as an exemplar of a heritage style is much more difficult. These days Corbusier-lite is as common as arts-and-crafts pastiche and just as insensitive. What further guidance does the Authority propose to ensure that cotemporary extensions enhance the host building rather than demean it? What sources of good practice will be published to support contemporary new builds in heritage areas as well as additions and extensions? The Cheshire East Design Guide needs updating in these respects as the assumption is that traditional approaches will be the norm.

7.4 The wording for Extensions requires clarification and strengthening. It is reasonably clear for ‘traditional’ styles of extension (presumably using designs and materials like the host building). It is less clear for ‘contemporary’ designs, particularly ‘modernist’ ones. The palette of materials (concrete, metal and glass) is more limited and designs have fewer opportunities for variation and adornment. Something more explanatory than ‘complement’ is needed. For example, ‘if a contemporary style is adopted the materials, quality, detailing and design should not detract or distract from the heritage asset(s), which is the main reason for the original listing’.